Security & privacy
Operational data deserves deliberate boundaries.
Queux is designed around explicit tenant scope, minimum necessary personal information, private document handling and accountable history.
Security principles
Boundaries that follow the organisation and site.
Security is not a badge or a single setting. These are the design controls Queux applies across protected workflows.
Policy checks
Private files
Accountable history
Protected integrations
Data minimisation
Access model
The selected site is context, not permission.
Every protected action needs an authorised user and a resource verified within the appropriate organisation and site.
Role-aware access
Owners, administrators, kitchen staff, reviewers and auditors receive only the capabilities assigned to their work.
Non-disclosing lookups
Cross-tenant identifiers return a not-found response where disclosure itself would expose information.
Session controls
Authentication, verification, rate limits and session protections surround sensitive entry points.
Audit context
Critical changes record who acted, when, where and why.
Uploads stay away from public paths.
Private plans, certificates and evidence should be stored outside the public disk. The upload flow validates extension, detected MIME type and size, uses server-generated names, and passes content through the configured malware-scanning adapter.
A download is streamed only after the current user and tenant scope are authorised.
External boundaries stay explicit.
Provider and payment integrations use maintained adapters so signature checks, timeouts, retries, idempotency and logging can be tested without placing credentials in presentation code.
Queux does not store payment-card details. Payment processing depends on the configured payment provider.
Privacy posture
Collect what the kitchen needs — and explain why.
The intended privacy approach is purpose limitation, minimum necessary data, controlled access and documented retention.
The public privacy policy draft and data processing terms draft describe the intended framework. Both require qualified legal review before commercial launch.
Need a deeper review?